Are
cartoon characters such as SpongeBob SquarePants and Buster the Rabbit
(who are, according to some critics, promoting homosexuality) threats to
the "traditional family"?
It is distressing to have great intellectual and moral concerns
reduced to the cartoonish, both in the form of animated film and the
posturing of some who wish to fight the culture wars at this level.
Most people who accept the label "conservative Christian," or its
synonyms, spend too much time throwing stones at the cultural citadels
and too little acquiring and developing the skills and knowledge to
allow them to compete in the ideological and cultural arena.
It has not always been so. Historically, Christians dominated the
professions, not solely by force of law, but by the power of their ideas
and example. William Blackstone's "Commentaries
on the Laws of England" became a classic legal work, though most
modern law schools rarely study it. Christian writers once occupied much
of literature. Recall some of the names: John Milton, George Herbert,
Flannery O'Connor, John Donne, G.K. Chesterton, J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S.
Lewis, Dorothy Sayers and T.S. Eliot.
From the fifth century until the near-modern era, Christian thinkers
dominated philosophy. They included Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, John Duns
Scotus, Anselm of Canterbury and William of Ockham.
Politics was once populated with Christians whose lives and
intellectual prowess influenced culture from the inside-out. In other
eras, President Bush's faith was unremarkable. Today, many in the
academic-cultural-political elites consider it odd, even dangerous.
For centuries, the arts virtually belonged to those of Christian
faith. Their names are legion, including Rembrandt van Rijn and Albrecht
Durer, not to mention scores of earlier artists, many of whom were under
the direct patronage of the church.
Music? Handel, Brahms and Bach once defined the word.
Science? Again, the list is long, including Isaac Newton, Johann
Kepler, Robert Boyle, Louis Pasteur, Michael Faraday and James Clerk
Maxwell.
What happened to rob music, philosophy, law and science of such great
thoughts and expressions? In part it was preaching that asserted
engagement with "the world" would taint the believer and so it was best
to separate one's self from its "corrupting" influence. The result has
been similar to what happens when a feeding tube is removed from a
comatose person. The patient starves to death.
Culture is starving because too many with a worldview that differs
from the prevailing one have withdrawn their nurturing influence. It
doesn't help when such people are persuaded it is better to criticize
institutions and their products, rather than going them one better.
How are academia, law, filmmaking or journalism improved when not
enough believers in God become professors, lawyers, filmmakers or
journalists? "Hollywood" does not suddenly begin making better movies
when it is criticized for making bad ones.
There are a few trying to integrate faith with their creative gifts,
but not nearly enough. Dr. Armand Nicholi of Harvard is one. Dr. Michael
Guillen, a theoretical physicist and former ABC News science
correspondent, is attempting to make his mark in a new book, "Can
a Smart Person Believe in God?" One of my favorite contemporary
artists, Ross Wilson of Northern Ireland, is another (go to
www.rosswilsonartist.com
for examples of his paintings and sculptures).
Another who has moved beyond cursing darkness to lighting candles is
Micheal Flaherty, who heads Walden Media. Flaherty's company is
releasing a delightful new movie, "Because of Winn-Dixie," next week.
Based on the novel by Kate DiCamillo, the film tells the story of a
lonely girl who teams up with a dog to make friends among and between
other lonely people in a small Florida town.
Just about every "value" you could want is in this film without being
preachy (though the girl's father is a non-stereotypical preacher). The
film stars two famous actresses, Eva Marie Saint and Cicely Tyson, and
introduces the exquisitely cute AnnaSophia Robb as "Opal." The film's
quality is first-class.
This is where the efforts of conservative Christians and those with
traditional values should be directed. Light dispels darkness and good
can overcome evil. But a light won't shine if it isn't lit and cursing
the darkness illuminates nothing.
Might we please see less energy (and money) spent on criticizing what
others are producing and more channeled into developing better lawyers,
professors, philosophers, artists, journalists and filmmakers? This way
produces results. Criticizing cartoon characters doesn't.